Author Topic: GNDd vs GNDa  (Read 268 times)

mickcris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
GNDd vs GNDa
« on: March 28, 2015, 12:34:32 PM »
Today I was RGB modding a PCE AV booster.  I have usually used GNDa, but when i was checking for ground on the AV booster, the one IC chip in it and also the grounds on the RCA jacks were connected to GNDd.
http://www.gamesx.com/misctech/pcebp.php

I am just wondering if one is better than the other to use and why there are 2 different grounds in the 1st place.  Most guides tell you to use GNDa like here:
http://www.mmmonkey.co.uk/pc-engine-rgb-mod/
« Last Edit: March 28, 2015, 12:43:53 PM by mickcris »

pnauts

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
Re: GNDd vs GNDa
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2015, 07:48:44 AM »
GNDa is for analog signals (as RGB), GNDd for digital signals (Data and adresses buses)

mickcris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: GNDd vs GNDa
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2015, 11:48:54 AM »
thanks for the answer. i figured it was something like that, but i still find it odd that the GNDd is not connected to the ground plain so what is it actually grounded to? also still wondering why they chose to use GNDd on the AV booster.

thesteve

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2952
Re: GNDd vs GNDa
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2015, 05:24:11 PM »
Both grounds are on the ground plane
The difference is what circuits the trace runs near

mickcris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: GNDd vs GNDa
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2015, 11:12:47 PM »
Both grounds are on the ground plane
The difference is what circuits the trace runs near

Thanks.  I looked at my system again.  The 2 grounds are connected by the rf shield.  I was measuring with the rf shield removed which is what threw me off into thinking they were not connected.  This was in an original white pc engine system so it may be different on other ones. 
« Last Edit: April 09, 2015, 02:21:16 AM by mickcris »