Author Topic: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?  (Read 1057 times)

Kitsunexus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3911
Re: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2007, 09:10:32 PM »
Man, there is something about camcorders that just screams "originated on video!"

Film grain... use Magic Bullet.

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?
« Reply #31 on: October 31, 2007, 10:06:36 PM »
No, I think it has more to do with the frame rate and color.

I come from the school where you should do your best to get it looking good during the shoot rather than rely on post-processing which does not work as well.  The video Bonknuts linked to looks very good, but something about it just screams "video".  Also, there's no way grain could be transferred to Youtube.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2007, 10:08:13 PM by Joe Redifer »

Kitsunexus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3911
Re: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?
« Reply #32 on: October 31, 2007, 10:20:03 PM »
Also, there's no way grain could be transferred to Youtube.

ARE YOU KIDDING!? Youtube video is the BEST! So good in fact, Peter Jackson is remastering The Lord Of The Rings to take full advantage of the Youtube codec.



And Duke Nukem Forever came out. :P

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?
« Reply #33 on: October 31, 2007, 10:25:50 PM »
To hell with Duke Nuke 'Em Forever, I'm waiting for Shenmue 3!

Kitsunexus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3911
« Last Edit: October 31, 2007, 10:47:38 PM by Kitsunexus »

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?
« Reply #35 on: October 31, 2007, 10:50:34 PM »
That's like a pun that is so bad that it physically hurts!

Bonknuts

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3292
Re: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?
« Reply #36 on: November 01, 2007, 02:30:21 AM »
No, I think it has more to do with the frame rate and color.

I come from the school where you should do your best to get it looking good during the shoot rather than rely on post-processing which does not work as well.  The video Bonknuts linked to looks very good, but something about it just screams "video".  Also, there's no way grain could be transferred to Youtube.

 Haha, yeah it was shot on an older Panasonic DVCPRO25 (AJ 250 model) in 30p mode. It looks less video-y on a TV or projection room, but yeah - magic bullet or film grain isn't going to fix the video look. Funny thing is that older Panasonic is an upgrade based on the Canon XL-1, which National Geographic had been using couple of years before (lot of there stuff looks like film). We've since upgraded to a AJ-SDX900 and it's true 24p looks amazing. It's not just the frame rate or DVCPRO50 format, or larger CCD, but the exposure for 24p mode combined with the luminance/color temp of that mode.

 I never used Magic Bullet, but I have used CineLook and the RE plug ins (great for taking 60i footage and converting into 30p without having the vertical res).


Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?
« Reply #37 on: November 01, 2007, 12:45:47 PM »
24p does rock.  I've used it with the Panasonic DVX100 (which I don't care for... that's what the trailer I posted above was shot with) and the Canon XL2 (which I use these days mostly).  The XL2 is capable of a fantastic picture.  I have also used the Canon XLH1 (HDV format) but despite its awesome lens, the picture just wasn't very good.  HDV only shoots in a 4:3 resolution and stretches it to 16:9 (1440x1080 instead of 1920x1080 for example).  Also HDV is based on MPEG, and MPEG sucks ass since it needs to be converted for frame-accurate editing.  That's a generation loss right there.  Then there's another generation loss when you encode it for the final destination, such as HD-DVD.  DV and DV50 both compress each frame individually which is MUCH preferred.  To my knowledge almost all consumer HD stuff is MPEG-based.  I'll wait until it's not and also until I can get my full resolution.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2007, 12:47:30 PM by Joe Redifer »

Pcenginefx

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?
« Reply #38 on: November 02, 2007, 08:31:21 AM »
Man, there is something about camcorders that just screams "originated on video!"

Film grain... use Magic Bullet.

I use 35mm camera adapters (the "SGpro") on my Sony FX1 (raw still from the 1080i HDV source, no CC,):



//Aaron
Owner/Creator of PCENGINEFX.com

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: WOW, AARON DID SPECIAL EFFECTS FOR A MOVIE!?
« Reply #39 on: November 02, 2007, 11:57:27 AM »
Looks good, but need to see it in motion. 

I used to do wedding videos.  Couldn't stand it.  I need to be involved in projects I care about.  I do not recommend myself for wedding videos.