« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Game Sack covers the PC-FX  (Read 2579 times)

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
Re: Game Sack covers the PC-FX
« Reply #30 on: April 10, 2015, 02:44:34 AM »
Quote from: Arkhan on April 09, 2015, 08:51:02 PM
Quote from: Punch on April 09, 2015, 05:37:02 PM
Stop hating the PC-FX.

ps: the 3D, non-pcfx games of the time were retarded and gay specially western ones

What's wrong with Return to Zork?


I can't tell if Joe is joking or not.   I didn't think there was a Sierra PC-FX game.   Zork isn't, and neither is Blue Chicago Blues.   

I could be mistaken.



I have a tough time telling when Joe is joking or not. However, I find it best to assume he is being sarcastic. Then, you can be pleasantly surprised (either way) when he clarifies his position.

TANGENT: I have been really curious about PC-FX baseball, personally. I regret not finding the game and playing it when I had a PC-FX (I was actually borrowing it with option to keep it...so I was reluctant to buy many games...)

Logged
  |    | 

Arkhan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14142
  • Fuck Elmer.
    • Incessant Negativity Software
Re: Game Sack covers the PC-FX
« Reply #31 on: April 10, 2015, 06:33:56 AM »
You f*cked up by not playing PowerLeague FX.   I hate baseball, but I like that game.
Logged
[Fri 19:34]<nectarsis> been wanting to try that one for awhile now Ope
[Fri 19:33]<Opethian> l;ol huge dong

I'm a max level Forum Warrior.  I'm immortal.
If you're not ready to defend your claims, don't post em.

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Game Sack covers the PC-FX
« Reply #32 on: April 10, 2015, 07:01:02 AM »
I actually wanted to play that one but couldn't get a good rip. We tried.
Logged

Arkhan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14142
  • Fuck Elmer.
    • Incessant Negativity Software
Re: Game Sack covers the PC-FX
« Reply #33 on: April 10, 2015, 07:07:38 AM »
Quote from: Joe Redifer on April 10, 2015, 07:01:02 AM
I actually wanted to play that one but couldn't get a good rip. We tried.


COULD HAVE BORROWED MY REAL COPY.

JUST SAYIN.

Logged
[Fri 19:34]<nectarsis> been wanting to try that one for awhile now Ope
[Fri 19:33]<Opethian> l;ol huge dong

I'm a max level Forum Warrior.  I'm immortal.
If you're not ready to defend your claims, don't post em.

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Game Sack covers the PC-FX
« Reply #34 on: April 10, 2015, 06:26:13 PM »
What's done is done.
Logged

sirhcman

  • Guest
Re: Game Sack covers the PC-FX
« Reply #35 on: April 10, 2015, 09:31:45 PM »
Quote from: Joe Redifer on April 10, 2015, 06:26:13 PM
What's done is done.

PC-FX Re-visited episode? 
« Last Edit: April 10, 2015, 09:39:47 PM by sirhcman »
Logged

Joe Redifer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Game Sack covers the PC-FX
« Reply #36 on: April 11, 2015, 08:20:08 AM »
That'd be a very short episode. I don't think the console is worth another look, at least not from us. Like has been discussed someone can make a more in-depth video if they like. Likely such a video would be multiple parts and based on a single game at a time.
Logged

sirhcman

  • Guest
Re: Game Sack covers the PC-FX
« Reply #37 on: April 11, 2015, 01:26:22 PM »
Quote from: Joe Redifer on April 11, 2015, 08:20:08 AM
That'd be a very short episode. I don't think the console is worth another look, at least not from us. Like has been discussed someone can make a more in-depth video if they like. Likely such a video would be multiple parts and based on a single game at a time.

What about an episode entitled "Games that Game Sack Forgot" ...  Could cover multiple systems, anyway just an idea :)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »