Author Topic: old articles on P.C. Engine-2 ~ SuperGrafx (Read 781 times)

TR0N · « **Reply #15 on:** December 19, 2005, 05:12:06 PM »

Supergrafx was a knee jerk reaction to the, SFC nuff said

supergrafxpcengine2 · « **Reply #16 on:** March 06, 2006, 10:12:44 AM »

I re-uploaded most of the pics using www.imageshack.us which does a better job of keeping photos online than photodump.

plus, here's another pic, the EGM review of SuperGrafx

EGM Number 15, October 1990, page 45

Keranu · « **Reply #17 on:** March 06, 2006, 03:02:39 PM »

Another neat article, though screw the guys who dissed the sound.

supergrafxpcengine2 · « **Reply #18 on:** March 17, 2006, 02:37:27 PM »

Quote from: "Keranu"

Another neat article, though screw the guys who dissed the sound.

well, as much as I love the SuperGrafx, I have to agree with the guys that said the sound was the same as Turbo or 'Lame' because it was basicly true.
NEC-Hudson didn't upgrade the sound system as they were expected to.

akamichi · « **Reply #19 on:** March 17, 2006, 03:58:07 PM »

Quote from: "supergrafxpcengine2"

well, as much as I love the SuperGrafx, I have to agree with the guys that said the sound was the same as Turbo or 'Lame' because it was basicly true.
NEC-Hudson didn't upgrade the sound system as they were expected to.

True. i was disappointed that the sound capabilities were the same. Maybe they shoulda added another PSG... which would have made it a dual 6280 processor machine. hehehe.

Bonknuts · « **Reply #20 on:** March 18, 2006, 03:38:34 AM »

Or better yet - SGX/PCE compatible CD games. Having the same PSG capabilities would be irrelevant if they actually made some SGX CD games.