The obvious point was that you're trying to split the player's attention away from the main action. I've yet to play a game where I enjoyed such an experience, but to each their own.
Crap. you probably won't like Atlantean much then.
People saying they like it doesn't 'prove' anything, nor does it negate that others don't like it (and vice
versa). Most people think that Deep Blue sucks, so does that 'prove' that you're wrong for enjoying it?
You said you can't prove fun. I think you can!
When the majority of people being asked are on the "do like it" side, and appear to be having fun, it leads me to believe the scrolling is probably not a huge concern and that the game is pretty good.
There's always going to be the minority that finds some faults and will play a game, label it as "crappy design", and then dismiss it and refuse to play it. Their loss.
Do you find fault with the scrolling too? You haven't really said either way yet. I am tallying up everyones thoughts. I found one person externally who thinks it's a bit narrow too.
You've never seen anyone go running towards the scroll side of the screen and run into an enemy?
No, I haven't, actually. That's why the whole thing was a bit alarming to me. Then again, everyone I watched playing it seemed to be all into the radar use and liked that aspect of the game. It allowed them to avoid rape.
This may be a case of a different kind of crowd's reaction. Most CCAG gamers are Apple ][/C64/Atari gamers, so maybe they're more accustomed to it.
That's why I just want to see the cheapness in action through normal play. If I try to do it myself, I'm going to end up sort of forcing it to occur, and that isn't going to help me realize the problem.
I can dislike part of a game and still love and enjoy the overall product (see Gotzendiener). Can't you?
Yeah, that's also why I am doing this. I'd like to think people aren't going to throw the whole game out and bitch and trash it because of the scrolling.
It's just like what I said about Castlevania.
I think I'll join Rover in refraining from this circle jerk.
At least you aren't calling it a technical flaw (read: bug) when it isn't anything of the sort.
There's not much point in a discussion where I'm labeled as a moron or pussy for not liking one single aspect of the game play.
Who said you're a moron? I don't think I did.
My point is, since only like, 4 people have raised the concern, maybe those 4 or so people are being a bit wimpy and should give it a better shot.
It'd be like if people complain about all the bullets in blazing lazers or something and that they have to dodge too much. You'd probably call them a sissy.
Some people are used to immediately being pretty good at games and walking through them. Sorry to anyone like that who finds themselves dying with this game.
Also, because we give a shit about all of you equally, we're coming up with ideas to tickle everyones weeners equally. So allow me to reach into the circle jerk and touch everyone.
So, hows that for taking into account pretty much every goddamn concern you stupid, pussy, moronic queefs came up with? :3 *hug*
hah, queef. That's a fun word.
Ghosts need fixed first before we get to the other stuff, which now includes:
Less tedious maps
Scrolling tweaksless retarded ghosts.