I'm curious to hear your thought as to where Revenge stumbles, even if it's only recollection.
We have a few threads over the years that explores this topic.
I played Adventure to death when it was released. I considered it a decent game, but nothing groundbreaking. It was enjoyable, but countless NES games gave it a run for the money, IMHO. Many NES games were superior.
When Revenge was released, I felt it was SOOOOOO MUCH BETTER than Adventure. Lots of fun, even though the spinning mechanics were slightly different.
At that time, I would have said: "Revenge is superior in every way, except perhaps for the music (Adventure had nice tunes that held up well)."
Now, my mind got stuck on "Revenge is superior." For years.
But as I revisited these games many times over the past 20+ years, I realized I had been overly harsh on the original gameāfor example, I kept going back to Adventure to replay (Revenge seems a bit of a chore to play through...Adventure less so).
I wish both games were more challenging. I felt this way when they were released. I feel the same now.
Also, I have not found the SNES Bonk games to be as strong as the PCE titles.
---------
OVERALL: I have come to a similar conclusion as Black Tiger.
But, to expand on things, I have realized that I was really harsh, back in the late 80's/early 90's, in judging all the games I played. I just assumed that "better games" existed ...and it would only be a matter of time before I eventually played them. However, as I played tons of arcade/Genesis/SNES/NES/SMS I slowly came to the realization that many of the games I had heavily criticized were actually pretty good, relative to all the other games.
Later, when I was able to play "import" games on Japanese 8-bit/16-bit consoles...it was clear that a lot of mediocre games (which I still enjoy) were released. This shattered my naive expectations (that an unlimited number of AAA titles I had been eluding me for my entire life).