You guys are wiring the composite video straight into the Chroma pin? That can't be right. Wouldn't the damage already be done to that Chroma, since its mixed with Luma before you're tapping it? Does that chip produce Chroma by itself?
Yeah, what Apollo said, the cap acts as a decent filter, but if you want the *best* result, you can disconnect the Luma in the amplifier circuit so that at the end of the Composite output, all you would have is Chroma and thus, no need for a filtering cap. That's how I wanna do my S-Video mod eventually and make a diagram for it as well.
You asked previously, how this S-Video craze got started. Best as I can trace it back to would be first here:
http://www.pcenginefx.com/forums/index.php?topic=9150.0Bonkuts posting the circuit for the NEC Composite amplifier which showed that a working Luma was being outputted by the 6260 video chip and then thesteve posting his initial design for an amp here:
http://www.pcenginefx.com/forums/index.php?topic=10850.msg206287#msg206287So I'd say early 2012 is when things kicked off with steve's initial circuit there. Then Keith Courage made
the first clear, big image here revising it a bit after consulting with thesteve.
Drakon actually did it another way in the link below which was something I had been consulting thesteve about. I wanted to know if there was a superior way to produce/obtain a clean Chroma and if that was better than a filtering capacitor. He said yeah, it is. So here's that, (disconnecting Luma from the Composite amp to get a clean Chroma):
http://www.pcenginefx.com/forums/index.php?topic=12339.0(
I wouldn't recommend his technique for disconnecting Luma though. I wanna find an early trace and just razor it to achieve disconnection, rather than his idea of soldering off a resistor... This way, you could scrape both ends of the trace and solder them back to restore it if you wanted. Anyhow, you get the idea of what is trying to be accomplished here from that image.)
I wanna put all that together eventually but with a Luma + Chroma mix, since while this idea gives you the best possible S-Video, it breaks Composite output. So to do this right, you'd break the trace of the Composite output near the AV-Out and you'd add a basic Luma+Chroma Mix to restore back Composite support. So, you'd get the best possible S-Video output, while still having Composite support, only that it would be slightly inferior...
I think that is the circuit that those bi-directional S-Video-to-Composite adapters use. That's what you'd need to do if you did this the more involved way. It will be slightly inferior, yeah, but the benefit of the best S-Video output outweighs that con I feel. In principle, you'll stop using the Composite output anyway after such a mod. Thing is though, a lot of new TVs are phasing out S-Video support and you'll only find Composite, Component, or HDMI, etc. So, you don't want to be lazy and permanently break Composite support to get this quality gain, so it'd be smart to restore it this way should you go this extra route. There is a possibility that connecting that 470pF cap to your perfect Chroma and Luma lines to restore Composite ruins them when they travel out the S-Video jack... That was the other thing I was thinking of, so you'd want to put two new transistors so as not to attenuate your S-Video output in order to restore Composite and not have it interfere... (I dunno for sure if this will happen, haven't done it yet, but it's a concern). Not a problem at all if you don't care about restoring Composite though. You would simply have to make sure you get one of these:
So that if you switch to a TV without S-Video, you could still use Composite with it. Or, look into the Component mod we've been working on, once again, thanks to thesteve. I think Professor mentioned that these adapters can be better than the native Composite output if you've got S-Video to work with. I bought a cable that does this from RadioShack for a $1 (RS, can you believe it??), a close out item, but my experience is that it's probably that cheap circuit I linked above because the quality is inferior than the existing Composite output that I tested it against from my BluRay player. Anyhow, if you want the best, there ya go!