You sir are a liar and a sociopath and sell damaged games as “Acceptable”. I have the pics and the f*cking un-boxing to prove it. Water damaged. Nice try.
I can't believe I'm defending a jerk, but...
According to eBay:
"Acceptable
An item with obvious and significant wear but is still operational. May have tears or holes in VHS/DVD box. The video game instructions and box may not be included."
Looks to me like if the games worked, they are "acceptable". The only category I can imagine below "Acceptable" is "non-working". Basically, "acceptable" condition means the game works, but no guarantees as to the condition otherwise. On eBay's condition scale for media, "acceptable" is the lowest level of condition that includes the stipulation that the item in question still functions. If there's water damage to the manual but the game works, it qualifies as acceptable.
If the seller doesn't post evidence, photographic or descriptive, as to why as item is only "acceptable" and not better, it is the responsibility of the buyer to inquire to find out more details. Caveat Emptor. He gave an ACCURATE condition rating, going by eBay's condition scale.
I would have been irritated to discover undisclosed water damage, but it isn't fraud and it isn't lying. It is my fault for not inquiring WHY some of the items are only "acceptable" and not better. Sounds to me like you were over-eager to get a deal and didn't do your due diligence. If the games didn't work, then that would be fraud and lying, but since they worked, they met the burden of "acceptable". And even if you didn't actually buy the stuff on eBay, you were relying on the eBay description. It's always easier to blame others for not giving you enough information instead of looking inward to ask yourself, "Why didn't I ask enough questions?"
