Hahahaha! Clearly, I am not opposed to "less commuting for all"...it's just silly to think that everyone is fortunate enough to work locally.
I didn't think I'd have to spell it out, but I see that I do:
I correctly identified Zeta's post as "overly-simplistic" because it is based, naively, on one factor (cost-benefit analysis of commute time for local vs. distant job).
Just for starters, here are the things that Zeta is conveniently ignoring:
(1) geographical location of family/friends (I live close to my family and friends)
(2) quality of school system (the better schools are in the more affluent towns)
(3) public parks and facilities
(4) cultural wasteland? Or easy, convenient access to arts & entertainment & universities & museums & etc.
(5) COMPROMISE: Spouse has local job (Zeta approves!) so only one poor bastard (Esteban) commutes
I could go on and on (as already pointed out, local job market is an important issue, depending on your career
), but the key point is that Zeta is overly simplistic in his analysis and ignoring MAJOR factors that many (most) families deal with.
Plus, I called Zeta out for being self-righteous. He is.
I love Zeta, but that doesn't mean I can't disagree with him.