Author Topic: That movie you just watched  (Read 21949 times)

SuperGrafx

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 448
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #330 on: August 16, 2015, 10:02:46 AM »
I watched the first 2 "Ip man" movies.
I hear there's a 3rd on the way. 

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #331 on: August 17, 2015, 02:57:17 AM »

Just watched Mad Max Fury Road. Everyone's been raving about it, saying it's amazing. So I went in with high expectations.
I thought it was a pretty good film, not amazing, just pretty good.


It was fun. It was not a complete insult to the series. Have there been many movies that pulled this off?

Sadly, no.




http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mad_max_fury_road/

It got a 98% rating on Rotten Tomatoes which is hard to believe, those critics are usually hard on action movies so that really surprised me. It's on my to-watch list when I get a chance.


I am surprised by this, too.



Just watched Cool World for shits and giggles, since I don't think I've seen it since it came out...

Basigner was hotter as a toon.

! No longer available


One of the few movies where the entire audience openly mocked it. That rarely happened in 80's suburbia. Even though we were just kids, we would usually privately mock a film.

This film did not deserve such discretion.

Of course, we were upset we paid good money to see it.

The exact same response occurred with Harry and the Hendersons.

Those two movies—I still never went back to watch them. I'm actually curious. I want to. I usually am not like this.

Once I commit, I watch a movie to its end. Usually.



  |    | 

dqualls187

  • Guest
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #332 on: August 17, 2015, 07:44:09 AM »
I watched the first 2 "Ip man" movies.
I hear there's a 3rd on the way.

The Ip man movies were pretty good!  Also like the Ong Bak movies and The Raid movies!

Just watched for me would be Ex Machina which I watched last night. Pretty good, better than i thought it would be. Wasn't crazy about the end but it was sort of inevitable.

Otaking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #333 on: August 17, 2015, 08:22:04 AM »
Just watched for me would be Ex Machina which I watched last night. Pretty good, better than i thought it would be. Wasn't crazy about the end but it was sort of inevitable.
Yeah thought Ex Machina just missed the mark. Through the film it was intriguing and building well to a big finish and then dropped the ball right at the end. Wasn't a terrible film or anything, just had the potential to be so much more with a better ending.

NightWolve

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5277
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #334 on: August 17, 2015, 09:32:33 AM »
The Ip man movies were pretty good!  Also like the Ong Bak movies and The Raid movies!

Just watched for me would be Ex Machina which I watched last night. Pretty good, better than i thought it would be. Wasn't crazy about the end but it was sort of inevitable.

Yeah, those Raid movies are something else, a new experience in martial arts movies! Basic premise: if you're not hyper quick as lightning, you're dead... The first one honestly blew me away and that doesn't happen very often - it really was a different martial arts movie than what I was used to. I love the 2nd one as well and while it lost a little steam, it's still pretty great!

EvilEvoIX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1895
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #335 on: August 20, 2015, 07:25:26 AM »


   This Movie is outstanding!!!!  I had no idea it existed until I saw it on demand and watched.  It's style is reminiscent of the traditional Horror Comedy's with practical special effects and reminds me very much of Re-Animator which could be the best film in this Genre.

The main protagonist stars James Lorinz who is very much the poor man's Andrew McCarthy.  All of the acting and actors are terrible.  Like they were literally ripped off the streets and told to read a cue card.  The story is in fact so bad that Writer/director Frank Henenlotter improvised the basic story at a pitch meeting. After getting the okay to make the picture, he then wrote the script for the movie.  An extreme example of putting the cart well before the horse.

Frankenhooker is an homage to writer Mary Shelley, the 'Frankenstein' films and the low budget gore movies of the 1960s and 1970s, the FX, make-up and prosthetics are deliberately clumsy.



The premise is simple, A medical student sets out to recreate his decapitated fiancée by building her a new body made of Manhattan street hookers.  It's a perfect Drive-In style move, great for fans of the genre and obviously a great party movie.  I fully endorse it wholeheartedly.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2015, 07:27:56 AM by EvilEvoIX »


Quote from: ProfessorProfessorson
I already dropped him a message on there and he did not reply back, so f*ck him, and his cunt wife.

dingsbums

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #336 on: August 20, 2015, 10:10:30 AM »
Yeah Frankenhooker is great. If you like that one you should check out Brain Damage / Elmer for
sure (if you have not seen it already  :wink:) - I always thought this is Henenlotter's best movie.

NightWolve

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5277
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #337 on: August 25, 2015, 11:55:28 AM »
Gotta give an enthusiastic thumbs up to "Mad Max: Road Fury!" It stars Charlize Theron and Tom Hardy as Mad Max. You might not realize it, but Tom Hardy also played the villain "Bane" in "The Dark Knight Rises (2012)," the final Batman movie in Christoper Nolan's rebooted and respectable trilogy.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mad_max_fury_road/

You know if Rotten Tomatoes gives a friggin' action movie a 98%, chances are it's worth watching!!!

I am quite skeptical of movie critics - I take their opinion with careful review. I've gotten a sense they develop grudges at certain directors, producers and/or actors, and so they'll shit on something if said person was involved in the movie because of it... So there's a politics at work there. I also find that they're usually the hardest on the action movie genre where the theme is primarily shit blowing up and what not, so when I saw a 98% review score on there, I couldn't friggin' believe it... Did hell freeze over I thought ? So I knew this one was on my to-watch list for sure and it does indeed deliver!

What was really interesting to me also is that George Miller/Miliotis, the original director of all the Mad Max movies, actually got to direct this one too!!! I would not have expected the original guy from 1979 had something to do with this, and heck, he hit it out of the ballpark, it did well, and recovered its production budget by the US sales alone, $373,374,961 worldwide! And since it succeeded, he got the greenlight for another one, so good for him on that too!

« Last Edit: May 06, 2018, 01:43:49 PM by NightWolve »

SuperGrafx

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 448
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #338 on: August 25, 2015, 01:23:15 PM »
Jack Ryan: Shadow Agent

Good god is Keira Knightley ghastly in this film. 

jeffhlewis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1111
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #339 on: August 25, 2015, 04:00:13 PM »
Gotta give an enthusiastic thumbs up to "Mad Max: Road Fury!" It stars Charlize Theron and Tom Hardy as Mad Max. You might not realize it, but Tom Hardy also played the villain "Bane" in "The Dark Knight Rises (2012)," the final Batman movie in Christoper Nolan's rebooted and respectable trilogy.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mad_max_fury_road/

You know if Rotten Tomatoes gives a friggin' action movie a 98%, chances are it's worth watching!!!

I am quite skeptical of movie critics - I take their opinion with careful review. I've gotten a sense they develop grudges at certain directors, producers and/or actors, and so they'll shit on something if said person was involved in the movie because of it... So there's a politics at work there. I also find that they're usually the hardest on the action movie genre where the theme is primarily shit blowing up and what not, so when I saw a 98% review score on there, I couldn't friggin' believe it... Did hell freeze over I thought ? So I knew this one was on my to-watch list for sure and it does indeed deliver!

What was really interesting to me also is that George Miller/Miliotis, the original director of all the Mad Max movies, actually got to direct this one too!!! I would not have expected the original guy from 1979 had something to do with this, and heck, he hit it out of the ballpark, it did well, and recovered its production budget by the US sales alone, $373,374,961 worldwide! And since it succeeded, he got the greenlight for another one, so good for him on that too!


I was thinking about this yesterday - Fury Road is hands down my #1 movie of the year...nothing else has even come close. Does anybody else think it has a legit shot at best picture at the oscars this year?

Punch

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3278
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #340 on: August 26, 2015, 02:50:50 PM »
I bet Mad Max is ranking close to 100% with those idiotic 'professional' critics because of all that bullshit "the feminist movie that men HATE" buzz that was going on at the movie's debut. Let's rate this high, that will show them. Not that there's anything wrong with the movie's empowerment of women, in fact it is a great improvement that helps to avoid blandness and gives personality to the picture. Not to mention that empowers women (duh).

That said, it is a great movie and a highly anticipated one. It deserves that rating and it indeed delivers, Nightwolve. I'm also looking forward to the Mad Max game that's going to be released following up on the new movie.

wildfruit

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2059
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #341 on: August 26, 2015, 03:14:32 PM »
Mortals, time travel exists on all planes. How I cannot say. TOP SECRET. However, I can tell you Ebert approved of mad max.
PROOF


esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
That movie you just watched
« Reply #342 on: August 27, 2015, 08:41:31 AM »
Mortals, time travel exists on all planes. How I cannot say. TOP SECRET. However, I can tell you Ebert approved of mad max.
PROOF



Ebert Obeyed. At least, he should have. GO SISKEL!

 
« Last Edit: August 27, 2015, 08:43:02 AM by esteban »
  |    | 

Galder

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 166
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #343 on: October 18, 2015, 12:01:53 PM »
Wait, was there a 'Mad Max' in that movie??? Cool atmosphere but -overall- far from my expectations. Tom Hardy not suitable for the role imo.

NightWolve

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5277
Re: That movie you just watched
« Reply #344 on: October 18, 2015, 12:18:00 PM »
Gotta give an enthusiastic thumbs up to "Mad Max: Road Fury!" It stars Charlize Theron and Tom Hardy as Mad Max. You might not realize it, but Tom Hardy also played the villain "Bane" in "The Dark Knight Rises (2012)," the final Batman movie in Christoper Nolan's rebooted and respectable trilogy.
I was thinking about this yesterday - Fury Road is hands down my #1 movie of the year...nothing else has even come close. Does anybody else think it has a legit shot at best picture at the oscars this year?

I dunno, but seems others are hoping and thinking the same too.

http://www.vulture.com/2015/08/could-mad-max-fury-road-make-it-to-the-oscars.html

I bet Mad Max is ranking close to 100% with those idiotic 'professional' critics because of all that bullshit "the feminist movie that men HATE" buzz that was going on at the movie's debut. Let's rate this high, that will show them. Not that there's anything wrong with the movie's empowerment of women, in fact it is a great improvement that helps to avoid blandness and gives personality to the picture. Not to mention that empowers women (duh).

Ah, that's an interesting theory if that's what it was. I wouldn't doubt it! Because it somewhat changed the formula from all the prior movies where Mad Max was the central character/hero whereas this time the hero responsibilities were divided between him and Charlize Theron's girl-power character, it got massive extra brownie points from them.

Yeah, it's bizarre to me that some sort of "the feminist movie that men HATE" buzz could've got started. There was nothing to hate here. It would be like hating Red Sonja opposite Arnold Schwarzenegger's character or something... That was a fine medieval action movie in similar vein to Conan the Barbarian, etc.

Wait, was there a 'Mad Max' in that movie??? Cool atmosphere but -overall- far from my expectations. Tom Hardy not suitable for the role imo.

Well, tastes are gonna vary. I thought he did great. It's also funny how they sort of worked in a jaw metal mask in the story right off the bat, perhaps as some sort of homage to Dark Knight Rises and his Bane character. If you're indicating you would've preferred someone with more charisma, I might agree there, but he did well enough in my book.
« Last Edit: October 18, 2015, 12:27:00 PM by NightWolve »