Author Topic: Shadow of the beast any good?  (Read 507 times)

ralphee

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Shadow of the beast any good?
« on: June 10, 2006, 11:32:06 PM »
Hey guys, relative noob to the engine, i had one years back, but so much software came along after i jumped ship, ive managed to bag an SG and ive got a core 2, i need to know if this game was better than the crappy megadrive port, and more akin to the amiga version, i know its not a great game, but i loved it in its day, i know ill need a CD system, but its one game on my CD list, anyone know if its on jap release too? thanks...lee

td741

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2006, 06:24:19 AM »
It's a really good port of the original first Shadow of the Beast game.  (There is a Megadrive port?  I know there's a SegaCD port of Shadow of the Beast 2)

Compared to the Amiga version, the controls and music are better.  I think the Amiga had more parrallax in some of the other levels, but I believe your character's sprite looks better and is better animated in the turbo-version (although the head looks tacked on.)

sunteam_paul

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4732
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2006, 07:28:38 AM »
This game is worth getting for the music alone.
It lacks some of the parallax of the Amiga version, but gameplay is better, though it's still not a great game.
If I remember correctly (and this was a long time ago), the US version is better as they improved the slow loading times of the intro animations. Aside from that there are no differences.
The PC Engine Software Bible
Quote from: Tatsujin
I just felt in a hole!

Odonadon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2006, 04:56:48 PM »
I always thought this was one of the best titles for the system, to be honest.  I love this game.  I've never played any of the other versions for comparison, however.

OD
http://www.turbo2k.net - the truly Turboist of all Turbo sites.

Keranu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9054
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2006, 10:23:52 PM »
Quote from: "sunteam_paul"
If I remember correctly (and this was a long time ago), the US version is better as they improved the slow loading times of the intro animations. Aside from that there are no differences.

Thanks for the info, that's very interesting. I'm sure steve will appreciate this.
Quote from: Bonknuts
Adding PCE console specific layer on top of that, makes for an interesting challenge (no, not a reference to Ys II).

Buster D

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2006, 03:04:12 PM »
Picked up the Japanese version of this game last for about $5... Man, the loading times are way too long and happen way too often, and for short little animations, too.  Most of the time the loading time is longer than the animation  :shock:

sunteam_paul

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4732
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2006, 03:49:35 AM »
Hate to say 'told you so' but...
The PC Engine Software Bible
Quote from: Tatsujin
I just felt in a hole!

Buster D

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2006, 03:34:09 PM »
Heh, you just said they were slow, you didn't say you could get up and go to the bathroom while they were loading  :lol:

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2006, 05:18:05 AM »
Quote from: "Keranu"
Quote from: "sunteam_paul"
If I remember correctly (and this was a long time ago), the US version is better as they improved the slow loading times of the intro animations. Aside from that there are no differences.

Thanks for the info, that's very interesting. I'm sure steve will appreciate this.
Yeah, seriously, who knew? I only have the U.S. version, though. Can we put this one in the "confirmed" category: the loading times for the U.S. version are improved?

For the folks who have the JP version: are your CD's in nice shape (no smudges, scratches, nicks, etc.)? I've noticed that games with scrathes sometimes take longer to load because the error-correction on the CD drive eats up a lot of time.
  |    | 

sunteam_paul

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4732
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2006, 10:46:29 PM »
Also, the US intros are windowed where the Japanese ones are full screen.
(Can you confirm this, it's from old notes and memory).
The PC Engine Software Bible
Quote from: Tatsujin
I just felt in a hole!

awack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 692
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #10 on: June 18, 2006, 12:47:57 AM »
Yes the japanese version is fullscreen, the us version is windowed and i think the japanese version also has added sound fx such as when the fog comes in under the door.

ralphee

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #11 on: June 18, 2006, 01:50:54 AM »
As i remember, the load times on the Amiga were high too, but damn i loved this game, on all your advice, ill now have to get a cd system for my Supergrafx as i need this game lol, the megadrive version just sucked for me, i had it on the system and i recently played it on kegafusion, it plays the same, but looks awful, anyone got any screenshots, i realise it wont have the paralaxing of the amiga version, but it sounds like it will satisfy my needs!

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #12 on: June 18, 2006, 09:02:57 AM »
Quote from: "ralphee"
As i remember, the load times on the Amiga were high too, but damn i loved this game, on all your advice, ill now have to get a cd system for my Supergrafx as i need this game lol, the megadrive version just sucked for me, i had it on the system and i recently played it on kegafusion, it plays the same, but looks awful, anyone got any screenshots, i realise it wont have the paralaxing of the amiga version, but it sounds like it will satisfy my needs!
Well, the MegaDrive version is harder. I liked the MegaDrive graphics, but the game was brutal. I got pretty far in the game, but never beat it.

Anyway, just to emphasize what has already been said: it is worth getting SotB SCD *for the music alone*. Period. I know that you're gonna love the SCD version, though it has clunky hit detection. If you are really hardcore, you'll think the SCD version is too easy. But I like the fact that the SCD is easier. In fact, it wasn't until a fellow board member (GUTS) pointed this out (that it was the easiest version) that I gave the SCD version a second look.

:)
  |    | 

nodtveidt

  • Guest
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2006, 06:20:30 PM »
The Atari Lynx version is really nice too, btw. :) That was my personal first experience with SotB...didn't play the PCE version till many years later...but yeah it's good, and yes the US one definately has faster loading cinemas (although frankly...those cinemas are pointless!).

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Shadow of the beast any good?
« Reply #14 on: June 18, 2006, 10:47:31 PM »
Quote from: "sunteam_paul"
This game is worth getting for the music alone.
.


word..please all listen to the last track on your city #6  :D

does anybody know, if the PCE BGM also comes from david whittaker?

amazing!
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^