Author Topic: Twin Peaks to return in 2017  (Read 1471 times)

blueraven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4450
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2017, 02:23:04 PM »
Woah. I have to go rewatch the series again now.
[Thu 10:04] <Tatsujin> hasd a pasrtty asnd a after pasrty ASDFTERTHE PARTY
[Fri 22:47] <Tatsujin> CLOSE FIGHTING STREET; CLOSE FORU; CLOSE INTERNETZ; CLOSE WORLD; CLOSE UNIVERSUM
--
Arkhan [05:15pm]: ill brbl im going to go make another free game noone plays lolol

DragonmasterDan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3508
Twin Peaks
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2017, 03:34:38 PM »
Twin Peaks returns tomorrow.

I watched the original series and for the most part enjoyed it, but after the big reveal the show dropped off considerably. I still haven't watched Fire Walk with me or Missing Pieces but I'm excited that the show is coming back. Is anyone else here interested in it?
--DragonmasterDan

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
Twin Peaks
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2017, 12:08:22 AM »
Twin Peaks returns tomorrow.

I watched the original series and for the most part enjoyed it, but after the big reveal the show dropped off considerably. I still haven't watched Fire Walk with me or Missing Pieces but I'm excited that the show is coming back. Is anyone else here interested in it?

So, I am glad you made this topic because I have been stuck waiting, waiting, waiting (in my car) and I needed something to distract me from the fact that "Don't worry, it will only be 20 minutes" turned into 40 minutes turned into 90 minutes turned into ________.

(Z) I don't have high expectations for new Twin Peaks. I would rather be surprised than get my hopes up. It is the safest thing to do.

(A) I never watched Missing Pieces.

(B) I agree that [no spoilers], at a certain point(s) in the original series, there was a *shift* (in tone/atmosphere) and once you lose that "eery" edge, it became harder to ignore that it was a soap opera (satire).

However, for the most part, I really enjoyed the original series. Those "shifts" in tone probably made things better, since it made me appreciate the creepy/disturbing undertones even more.

(C) I really, really liked Fire Walk With Me, but I don't know how it is perceived by most Twin Peaks fans... my friends (who also watched the TV series when it originally aired), had very mixed feelings about the film when it came out.

As a film, I think it stands on its own....it might even be better than the series (IMHO, probably I'm in the minority, I'm talking about the visuals, the acting, the atmosphere, the ability to experience things as one film instead of the story arcs/cliffhanger rhythm of a TV series...I saw Twin Peaks on TV and commercials and week-long gaps really "ruined" the atmosphere conjured up...relative to a well-made movie, that is. It might be a moot point now that folks can stream stuff).

I was already a fan of Blue Velvet by the time Fire Walk With Me came out, so TP/Fire Walk With Me seemed very "tame" in comparison, but I know some friends who wanted the film to "feel" more warm/cozy (you know what I mean...the good-hearted characters from the TV show)...something the TV series did really well (creating likeable, if goofy, warmth...but genuine, somehow).

(D) A year (or two?) ago I rewatched the Twin Peaks TV and it held up better than I thought it would. In fact, it was better than my original experience (no commercials this time). I never skipped the intro, even thought it gets repetitive when binge watching, because I always felt it did such a ridiculously awesome job of setting the mood and atmosphere for the original TV airing (this should be a topic itself--the function of opening credits for commercial TV shows). 

(T) TRIVIA: I never skip the opening credits for Trailer Park Boys...because the beautiful, idyllic opening music and scenes is a necessary contrast to the silly/chaotic content of each episode. I love/need the "balance" between the two.

(FWWM) If I had a damn signal out here, I'd start watching Fire Walk with Me and eat up all of my data for the month.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2017, 12:21:34 AM by esteban »
  |    | 

DragonmasterDan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3508
Re: Twin Peaks
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2017, 02:58:51 AM »


So, I am glad you made this topic because I have been stuck waiting, waiting, waiting (in my car) and I needed something to distract me from the fact that "Don't worry, it will only be 20 minutes" turned into 40 minutes turned into 90 minutes turned into ________.

(Z) I don't have high expectations for new Twin Peaks. I would rather be surprised than get my hopes up. It is the safest thing to do.

(A) I never watched Missing Pieces.

(B) I agree that [no spoilers], at a certain point(s) in the original series, there was a *shift* (in tone/atmosphere) and once you lose that "eery" edge, it became harder to ignore that it was a soap opera (satire).

However, for the most part, I really enjoyed the original series. Those "shifts" in tone probably made things better, since it made me appreciate the creepy/disturbing undertones even more.

(C) I really, really liked Fire Walk With Me, but I don't know how it is perceived by most Twin Peaks fans... my friends (who also watched the TV series when it originally aired), had very mixed feelings about the film when it came out.

As a film, I think it stands on its own....it might even be better than the series (IMHO, probably I'm in the minority, I'm talking about the visuals, the acting, the atmosphere, the ability to experience things as one film instead of the story arcs/cliffhanger rhythm of a TV series...I saw Twin Peaks on TV and commercials and week-long gaps really "ruined" the atmosphere conjured up...relative to a well-made movie, that is. It might be a moot point now that folks can stream stuff).

I was already a fan of Blue Velvet by the time Fire Walk With Me came out, so TP/Fire Walk With Me seemed very "tame" in comparison, but I know some friends who wanted the film to "feel" more warm/cozy (you know what I mean...the good-hearted characters from the TV show)...something the TV series did really well (creating likeable, if goofy, warmth...but genuine, somehow).

(D) A year (or two?) ago I rewatched the Twin Peaks TV and it held up better than I thought it would. In fact, it was better than my original experience (no commercials this time). I never skipped the intro, even thought it gets repetitive when binge watching, because I always felt it did such a ridiculously awesome job of setting the mood and atmosphere for the original TV airing (this should be a topic itself--the function of opening credits for commercial TV shows). 

(T) TRIVIA: I never skip the opening credits for Trailer Park Boys...because the beautiful, idyllic opening music and scenes is a necessary contrast to the silly/chaotic content of each episode. I love/need the "balance" between the two.

(FWWM) If I had a damn signal out here, I'd start watching Fire Walk with Me and eat up all of my data for the month.

My expectations aren't sky high for the return but I think there's some potential there for it to be good.

I've had a Twin Peaks blu-ray containing the original series and both Fire Walk with me and Missing pieces in HD set sitting in my amazon cart for a few days now and I just haven't felt like pulling the trigger but I may.

I only first watched Twin Peaks maybe five years ago at the urging of an ex, and initially as expected the show had me hooked. Then came the reveal and the rest of it was kind of a chore to watch (except the last episode).
 
She also complained about fire walk with me being bad and told me to avoid it, and up to this point I have,
--DragonmasterDan

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
Re: Twin Peaks
« Reply #19 on: May 21, 2017, 03:46:45 AM »
^ I think that if you like Lynch for more than Twin Peaks (not everyone is a fan of his movies), then you will be able to appreciate the movie. That's how I feel, anyway.

I think a lot of folks were disappointed with Fire Walk With Me because they were expecting something different (and I can't blame them, since they were only familiar with TV series).

YOU SHOULD WATCH IT.

Also, I enjoyed watching every episode of Twin Peaks...even the "lesser ones" were good compared to 99.99% of other crappagio out there (especially at the time it aired).

  |    | 

TR0N

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6421
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #20 on: May 21, 2017, 08:57:50 PM »
Bump ! Well i just watched the new episode another murder and plenty of wtf moments.Any any one else watch it  ?

PSN:MrNeoGeo
Wii U:Progearspec

Galder

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 166
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #21 on: May 22, 2017, 10:41:00 AM »
I just did. Loved it. Typical retro Twin Peaks, Lynch feeling. Quite brutal for a first episode. I will watch it a couple more times to manage to connect everything before the next one is out :mrgreen:

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #22 on: May 22, 2017, 10:49:22 AM »
I just re-read my comments above...thankfully, they are consistent with this:

https://www.pcenginefx.com/forums/index.php?topic=22287

I wish we could MERGE these threads.

Mods?
  |    | 

Necromancer

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21366
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #23 on: May 22, 2017, 10:54:53 AM »
I wish we could MERGE these threads.

Mods?

U.S. Collection: 97% complete    155/159 titles

DragonmasterDan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3508
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #24 on: May 22, 2017, 01:06:20 PM »
I rewatched the last episode of the old series. I'm about to start the new one, my fingers are crossed.
--DragonmasterDan

DragonmasterDan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3508
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #25 on: May 23, 2017, 04:43:16 AM »
Update last night I watched the first two episodes. I'm very impressed so far.
--DragonmasterDan

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #26 on: May 23, 2017, 10:09:02 AM »
Update last night I watched the first two episodes. I'm very impressed so far.

I'll have to watch the final few episodes... then the new series!

Maybe this weekend I'll have time.

:)
  |    | 

DragonmasterDan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3508
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #27 on: May 23, 2017, 10:57:19 AM »


I'll have to watch the final few episodes... then the new series!

Maybe this weekend I'll have time.

:)

You'll like it.
Slight spoiler below
[spoiler]Laura Palmer wasn't murdered, she died by eating soy substitutes for meat.[/spoiler]
--DragonmasterDan

blueraven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4450
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #28 on: June 23, 2017, 05:37:51 PM »
Apparently I can see all of this on Netflix. Engage.
[Thu 10:04] <Tatsujin> hasd a pasrtty asnd a after pasrty ASDFTERTHE PARTY
[Fri 22:47] <Tatsujin> CLOSE FIGHTING STREET; CLOSE FORU; CLOSE INTERNETZ; CLOSE WORLD; CLOSE UNIVERSUM
--
Arkhan [05:15pm]: ill brbl im going to go make another free game noone plays lolol

TR0N

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6421
Re: Twin Peaks to return in 2017
« Reply #29 on: June 23, 2017, 08:58:13 PM »
Apparently I can see all of this on Netflix. Engage.
Only for the original series if you want to watch the new season it's only on showtime .
« Last Edit: June 23, 2017, 09:14:32 PM by TR0N »

PSN:MrNeoGeo
Wii U:Progearspec