While I'm sure to most adults the mercury levels are low enough now not to really effect them. I am still concerned about small kids and look at all the other crap in these shots. Remember this is directly into your blood and not ingesting where your body is able to filter more. What and who are these vaccines tested on and for how long, what are long term side effects and are these even being looked at? I am doubting they are doing 20 year tests before they roll one of these things out. You have to remember this is a business and not some all loving mother making these things. I'd like to see better treatment once you have one of these viruses. And having better non vaccine prevention.
These non-arguments have been used by antivaxxers for years and years now. The answers are simple:
-There is negligible difference in mercurial toxicity between children and adults. Not only that, but the mercury concentration used in older vaccines was still way, way below the toxicity level for even infants. This is probably the oldest and most easily debunked scares in all of the history of anti-vax lunacy.
-What "other crap"? Be more specific.
-The method of introduction is immaterial. This is a nonsense argument.
-There is no need to do long-term testing of this type for two reasons. One, long-term testing "in the wild" has already been done with vaccines that came long before, and two, scientists already know about all possible contraindications. It is a pointless waste of time to do extensive testing when you already know the shit works.
-Microsoft is a business, yet most people use Windows and not Linux. This is a bullshit argument.
-The whole point of vaccines is to
prevent people from getting
preventable diseases.
-Yeah... ask Steve Jobs how well "alternative medicine" worked out for him. Oh wait...
