Author Topic: Blood Gear?  (Read 1297 times)

shubibiman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1832
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #15 on: February 20, 2015, 07:38:32 AM »
When I said professional, I meant that they were renowned. There's but a few PCE CD games with amateurish voice acting tbh.
Self proclamed Aldynes World Champion

Necromancer

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21374
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #16 on: February 20, 2015, 07:59:33 AM »
When I said professional, I meant that they were renowned. There's but a few PCE CD games with amateurish voice acting tbh.

Right, but the point was that well polished scripts and intriguing plots are hardly universal.

U.S. Collection: 98% complete    157/161 titles

spenoza

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2751
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #17 on: February 20, 2015, 04:02:44 PM »
Think about it this way: a professional voice actor can often bring up a poor script, even if only a little. An amateurish voice "actor" can tank even a great script.
<a href="http://www.pcedaisakusen.net/2/34/103/show-collection.htm" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">My meager PC Engine Collection so far.</a><br><a href="https://www.pcenginefx.com/forums/" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">PC Engine Software Bible</a><br><a href="http://www.racketboy.com/forum/" c

SamIAm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2015, 04:19:52 PM »
On one hand, there aren't as many cases of people who are totally unqualified amateurs doing voice work in Japan. The minimum standards are much higher, especially in the 90s, and that goes for everything from how well the voices are matched and the performance quality to the recording equipment.

On the other hand, though, not everything is "good". A lot of it is just blandly "competent". Some of it is definitely "below par", and can make you shake your head or smile awkwardly or whatever you do when you see someone trying but not quite pulling it off.

I brought it up because Blood Gear has, so far, struck me as being "below par". For example, I think the actors recorded their lines separately because some of the reactions between characters seem incongruent to me.

This is going to ruffle some feathers, but I always thought Dracula X's voice acting fell squarely in the "competent" category. Put away your pitchforks, it's far from bad. It's not really "bad" at all. It's kind of like a Betty Crocker cake.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 05:10:39 PM by SamIAm »

esteban

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24063
Blood Gear?
« Reply #19 on: February 20, 2015, 11:30:31 PM »
Think about it this way: a professional voice actor can often bring up a poor script, even if only a little. An amateurish voice "actor" can tank even a great script.

Absolutely. It is so true in film/television, it only makes sense that it would be true with voice work, stage work, etc.

It shall henceforth be known as the

Voice Actor Axiom (VAA): A professional voice actor can often bring up a poor script, even if only a little. An amateurish voice "actor" can tank even a great script.

Of course, another element to this, which SamIAm mentions below, is the "bland, sterile overall product" that results from "technically competent acting/engineering/direction"...

You don't have to look further than Hollywood or Le Television to see the sterile, technically competent, norm.

It really is nice, and exciting, when we encounter a truly *inspired* ensemble of voice actors performing a script.



On one hand, there aren't as many cases of people who are totally unqualified amateurs doing voice work in Japan. The minimum standards are much higher, especially in the 90s, and that goes for everything from how well the voices are matched and the performance quality to the recording equipment.

On the other hand, though, not everything is "good". A lot of it is just blandly "competent". Some of it is definitely "below par", and can make you shake your head or smile awkwardly or whatever you do when you see someone trying but not quite pulling it off.

I brought it up because Blood Gear has, so far, struck me as being "below par". For example, I think the actors recorded their lines separately because some of the reactions between characters seem incongruent to me.

This is going to ruffle some feathers, but I always thought Dracula X's voice acting fell squarely in the "competent" category. Put away your pitchforks, it's far from bad. It's not really "bad" at all. It's kind of like a Betty Crocker cake.

This is certainly true outside of Japan, so it is not surprising to see that Japan is not immune to "competent, but sterile" or "bland, but professional" when it comes to pop culture.

Every now and then, something will be truly INSPIRED, and the audience will recognize it as such....

In a way, I feel that I am lucky since I can appreciate Dracula X cinemas as being *better* than they are for a native speaker/discerning critic.

This happens a lot with foreign films...where non-native speakers are much less discerning when it comes to dialogue/script because they lack tools to truly evaluate the original language/content.

This is not only the "Curse of the Gaijin" but the "Blessing of the Gaijin"...
« Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 11:38:59 PM by esteban »
  |    | 

SamIAm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2015, 10:58:47 PM »
That apparently goes for the German intro as well:
http://www.pcenginefx.com/forums/index.php?topic=7918.msg394703#msg394703

Funny that these came up at the same time.

toymachine78

  • Guest
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #21 on: February 24, 2015, 01:57:51 AM »
I use Google translate on JP games with a lot of written dialogue and for the menus. Its kind of a pain to keep snapping pics of the TV screen but that's only for the story. Once you learn the menus you're good. It does a decent enough job to give me the gist of the story or conversation.

SignOfZeta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8497
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #22 on: February 24, 2015, 09:19:13 AM »
I honestly wasn't even thinking about voice acting when I mentioned what we now know as "the gaijin curse/blessing". A dumb thing is a dumb thing regardless of who wrote it or read it. An average Super Robot Wars game nowadays consists of literally *hours* of reading about who's boobs are bigger, who's too embarrassed to ask who out on a date, recapping storylines, and other basic infantile tedium. It's better to just hold down L+A and blast right through all that shit so you can get to the robot smashing.

If I wanted to read something good I'd pick up a book. Currently: Banvard's Folly. It's very good.

Arkhan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14142
  • Fuck Elmer.
    • Incessant Negativity Software
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2015, 11:10:12 AM »
I want an RPG where all of the voice actresses (there will be no dudes in this game) have obnoxious high pitched animuuuuu voices.

and it will have the most serious storyline of all time.

[Fri 19:34]<nectarsis> been wanting to try that one for awhile now Ope
[Fri 19:33]<Opethian> l;ol huge dong

I'm a max level Forum Warrior.  I'm immortal.
If you're not ready to defend your claims, don't post em.

SignOfZeta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8497
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #24 on: February 24, 2015, 12:41:21 PM »
I think that's Megumi Paradise.

Black Tiger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11242
Re: Blood Gear?
« Reply #25 on: February 24, 2015, 02:53:00 PM »
Private Eye Doll + battles.
http://www.superpcenginegrafx.net/forum

Active and drama free PC Engine forum