Author Topic: PSA: Castlevania: Rondo of Blood (PC ENGINE) VS Dracula X (SNES)  (Read 2648 times)

Jibbajaba

  • Guest
Re: PSA: Castlevania: Rondo of Blood (PC ENGINE) VS Dracula X (SNES)
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2015, 08:27:46 AM »
Super Volleyball was though.   I like that game a lot.   Mostly for the injuring players.

Call me crazy, but for some reason I think Super Volleyball is a lot of fun.

seieienbu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1992
Re: PSA: Castlevania: Rondo of Blood (PC ENGINE) VS Dracula X (SNES)
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2015, 09:05:59 AM »
I think the kaleidoscope room in Castlevania 4 holds up well enough.  The room immediately before it that rotates counter clockwise though?  That's probably the low point in the game.  It's soooo slow and boring.  When Konami did the same effect in Legend of the Mystical Ninja it takes like, a second, and is really cool.

I think CV4 is a pretty good game.  It shows off a lot of the SNES's highpoints; it's got good music, detailed enemies/backgrounds, lots of colors.  As far as being a Castlevania though, to me the game feels a bit too easy due to the 8 way whip.  There's almost no need for sub weapons because you can just cover all angles with the whip so you never have to choose between Holy Water to attack beneath you or the Axe to attack above you.  The torture chamber stage was tough to get through, then the set of bosses before Dracula weren't especially easy either.  But aside from that the game just felt too easy.  Particularly after working my way through Castlevania 3.
Current want list:  Bomberman 93

Gentlegamer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1459
Re: PSA: Castlevania: Rondo of Blood (PC ENGINE) VS Dracula X (SNES)
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2015, 09:20:39 AM »
I think CV4 is a pretty good game.  It shows off a lot of the SNES's highpoints; it's got good music, detailed enemies/backgrounds, lots of colors.  As far as being a Castlevania though, to me the game feels a bit too easy due to the 8 way whip.  There's almost no need for sub weapons because you can just cover all angles with the whip so you never have to choose between Holy Water to attack beneath you or the Axe to attack above you.  The torture chamber stage was tough to get through, then the set of bosses before Dracula weren't especially easy either.  But aside from that the game just felt too easy.  Particularly after working my way through Castlevania 3.

My thoughts as well. The addition of more jumping control and eight way whip was not compensated for in the enemy or level design, making sub-weapons superfluous. It's a disappointing step back following Castlevania III.

Most people love it because it's so much easier. I need my Castlevania to be hard.

warpig227

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: PSA: Castlevania: Rondo of Blood (PC ENGINE) VS Dracula X (SNES)
« Reply #33 on: March 06, 2015, 05:40:20 AM »
can't watch that, but my opinion on both games is about equal. love both

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: PSA: Castlevania: Rondo of Blood (PC ENGINE) VS Dracula X (SNES)
« Reply #34 on: March 07, 2015, 01:47:27 AM »
UNBELIEVABLE MINDBLOWING UBERSHIT!!!

never played the shit bitd, but wanted to be the super pros now in 2015, playing  on a WiiU. about 22 years too late to the show arseholes.

also no meantions about the huge amount of animations the PCE uses compared to the SNES.

also they didn't even know that the PCE drac x invented the back flip of richter. that alone disqualifies them at max. levels :lol:
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^