Sit tight, profprof. We aren't each others' biggest fans, but we should be on the same side of this one.
WTF are you even talking about. What does that even mean. When you go to expose someone for scams, you provide f*cking proof on the first post, not the 15th one. Otherwise it reads off like cheap slander. I don't know this guy you are accusing. What I do know is that you are saying he is a scamming piece of shit. But you don't submit any evidence to support your case. No links. No pics. No nothing. I would be more then happy to support you in this matter once you convince me it is legit. Gather your evidence and come back and present it and make a good solid case.
It is better to alert folks—err on the side of caution.
We are a small forum, and if someone leveled a charge of "scammer" against someone prematurely, well, it could always be rectified (with apologies around).
For example, the recent episode with BigusSchmuck... I don't think his reputation was marred for more than a day or two (if that).
Even I have found it in my heart to give Bigus another chance.
If I suspected that someone here was shady, I don't know if I would wait for inconclusive proof (assuming that such proof could ever be obtained).
The preceding assumed that nullity's intensions were sincere and that he isn't a total imbecile (that is, that he has the mental calcify to gather legitimate, conclusive proof).
However, even if nullity is simply slandering someone (which is a shame), it certainly provides us with some drama and entertainment.
So please allow us jaded, sadistic, apathetic, bored and conspiracy-obsessed rubber-neckers a chance to eat popcorn and watch the show.