Also, you severely misunderstand what caused me to lash out. You didn't actually take a dig at me. Nothing you said offended *me* directly. Your attitude and statements about Simon in comparison to other things is what set me off. None of that really has much to do with me.
Yep, we been over this numerous times before ... you and I talk differently, and have different ways of expressing humor. We're decades apart in time, and a continent apart in our formative years.
I don't exactly love your constant personal insults, potty mouth, and fascination with Japanese schoolgirls and rape.
We're different. Deal with it.
You've done good things for the community, and I hope that my time and work here are also seen as providing some benefit by most folks here, even despite my love of long-winded posts, and occasional boring trips down memory-lane.
Again, you didn't take a dig at me. You didn't make fun of my work or abilities. You used a little bias to talk about Simon as the OK party while throwing someone else under the bus. Maybe your actual tone and intent was not what I read. Just like maybe you're reading my tone different than I intend. f*ck if I know. None of this really changes the uncool nature of throwing people under the bus with little to go off of.
Errr ... in that video, Simon called the TV show "rubbish", which is a perfectly-valid personal-opinion, even if you don't agree with it, and he called Chris's CV "smoke-and-mirrors", which it may or may not be, but it still says nothing about his ability to actually get the job done.
I don't see any bus-riding going on there.
Perhaps there were a lot of personal-insults and attacks on Chris's professionalism in other materials that I haven't seen or heard.
Both you and Chris have certainly thrown around enough of those at Simon that I have seen, both here and on the website.
In my position of ignorance, that makes it look like it's you guys that are riding the bus.
You mean like your old pal Simon that you built up a bit and talked about like some comical, great character while stepping on others, out of ignorance? Seems like he tripped while walking the walk.
So what is it. do you respect the guy, or what? He doesn't seem to fit your criteria for respect, yet your tales and excitement about him say otherwise.
If you actually read what I wrote, I don't believe that I built him up, at all.
He wasn't a "pal" ... we didn't particularly like each other. He was the same vocal ass back then that he still is today. I was certainly a bit of an ass too, back then. Some would say that I still am.
But I saw him do good work, and I respect his ability to be able to do so. That doesn't mean that he still does so ... but it does mean that I'm more likely to give him the benefit-of-the-doubt vs someone with Chris's nebulous background, and crowdfunding history.
I just thought that his story was amusingly-told ... which it was (to me). I would like to note that he managed to say it without any of the personal insults or name-calling that both you and Chris have been doing.
From the outside, I see a project that is off-the rails and possibly burning money, that's fired the 2 lead members of the development staff, is having public he-said-she-said spats, and has had what seems to be lackluster progress over the time period.
It looks like it *might* be coming around now, but so far, at a time when the budget should be running out, and the product delivered, there's not one heck of a lot to show.
So, that raises questions, like WTF is really going on???
I would certainly like to know if Simon really f*cked up and didn't get the work done.
But I just don't trust one-sided stories.
By your own definition, this person is/was not operating as a professional, outside of the acting like a douchebag part, since they delivered garbage while squandering pay.
That could be certainly be what happened ... in which case I'd give Simon sh*t over it if I ever saw him again (unlikely). I'm not discounting it ... but neither am I saying that I accept it, yet.
Unless there is more information out there that I haven't seen, or other witness account of the events, this still looks like a he-said-she-said situation.
Sure, we can all agree that Simon is an mouthy-ass, but I haven't
seen proof (yet) that he took money for crappy or non-existent work.
And even
if Simon were the Anti-Christ, and did absolutely nothing (in which case he would deserve all this sh*tstorm and more) ... he was fired back in February/March of last year according to what I can make out from the appearance of the work from the "new" sprite artist that's shown on the Saber Rider Facebook page.
That's 10 months ago.
The sprites that you're seeing in the Dreamcast demo look like they were the ones posted on Facebook between March and May 2016 (and the demo uses only a small set of them).
The backgrounds look like they're the same ones that were shown back then, too.
The Character Select screen was shown in July.
I'm not really seeing much, or possibly any (I could be wrong), art in the yesterday's demo video, or on Facebook that seems to have been produced after July/August.
What's been going on?
Even though Chris Strauß was ill in August/September ... does that mean that the entire project stopped during that time?
Did it stop burning-cash during that time?
I'm sorry if you don't like these questions, and since I didn't participate in the KickStarter, then perhaps I have no right to know the answers ... but they're still valid questions and concerns.
You really don't seem to get what the issue is that I'm concerned about.
It's not whether one artist whose talent you don't like, and whose attitude you don't like, and who may possibly have run off with 3 or 4 months of whatever-they-were-paying-him money, over 10 months ago.
It's about whether the project is ever going to see the light of day, or if the "Design/Project Coordinator" is looking likely to burn through a 2nd round of crowdfunding with little to show for it.
Which, by-the-way, would leave you unpaid, and in the the position to be unable to complete a PCE version of the Saber Rider license that you came here and asked people to support the KickStarter for.
The project isn't doing bad. It's actually doing fine, especially compared to how other KSs have gone.
I hope so.
Does that mean your excitement and "looking forward to it" remarks towards the project owner are sort of just BS?
You seem to think that I might have some petty vendetta against the project just because they fired someone that I haven't worked with in nearly 30 years. That's bollocks!
Nope, I want to see it get finished, and to a decent quality, both so that it doesn't end up as another failed-KickStarter, and so that you get to do your PCE version.
If that happens, then people here won't have wasted their money, and the PCE may get a tiny bump-up in its place on people's radar for future projects.
So that's another unfortunate KS side effect: You pay an idiot and they f*ck off with your money.
That is definitely the concern.
The big question that won't be resolved for a while, yet, is the precise number and distribution of those "idiots" in this particular project.
Yeah, I mean, we're not all just here to spew out PCE games for people, lol. The fact that money is involved DOES change things to a point, though.
Yes, it does.
Thanks for the detailed info about what's going on from your end of the project and your future plans.
You may have forgotten ... but that was kinda the first question that I asked.