What really bothered me -- and what almost every magazine, newspaper, and TV news service did -- was misreport system specs, which got copied, repeated by other news services with no fact checking. (The game for you guys to play is to spot the mistakes below and write what the correct figures are.)
Eg: I just saw a TV report on the Super Famicom. They said the SFC's palette of 32,768 colours far surpasses the NES' 512...
Or even the Megadrive's 2048...
Or the Sega Master System's 256...
The Turbo's max resolution is 256x216. The Genesis wins at 320x224.
EGM even printed that though the Turbo was 256x216, the SuperGrafx was more colourful with a palette of 4096, but with a screen resolution of 160x146.
This just went on and on. It's obvious most of these reporters diligently checked these specs by putting their thumb up to the screen and just guesstimating.