What I would really like to know is why have these forums turned so negative lately?
It seems like it's always the same individual, or individuals either flaming someone or just being outright a$$hole-ish..
Never offering something positive anymore...
chi-seen....
Well my post was a throw-away comment, and only meant to be taken with a pinch of salt.
Direct remakes of 2D classics have very rarely been better, or even equal, to the original games. You can't deny the spread of poor reviews that greeted the initial Sega Ages remakes such as Out Run, Golden Axe, Space Harrier etc.
For example, IGN said of the version of Golden Axe:
The most disappointing game in the pack is, by far, Golden Axe, a game that would have definitely been the shining star of the collection. Sure, the original game couldn't stand up to today's elaborate presentation, but what Sega did for its remastered mode is an absolutely terrible recreation of one of the company's more remembered classic arcade properties. What was once beautiful 2D sprite and background artwork is now sub-par 3D, with awful character renders and animation fronting a very sloppy gameplay port of the original fantasy hack-and-slash game. Anyone who's spent a single quarter on the arcade version can nitpick a laundry list of issues, problems, and bugs that pop up in the Sega Classics Collection version.This is only an example. Every review I have read and comments from friends has been of the same low opinion.
Are you also denying that the PC Engine version of Golden Axe something other than dreadful?
If something is crap then I'm not afraid to say it.
I've not seen details of the later Sega Ages conversions, and I'm happy if they are finally living up to the promise of the originals. It's about time they treated these games with the respect they deserve rather than give them to their trainees as a project to do. Most of the time they are more interested in making a fast buck then producing something that enhances the original versions.