Author Topic: which is more reliable?  (Read 741 times)

elnino

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 248
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #15 on: August 04, 2007, 06:17:55 AM »
they can play Supergrafx HuCards, of which there are only a half dozen, and none are impressive, IMO.

C'mon, three of them are among the best games for the PCE and really worth to buy the SGFX system!

Um...what? I've played all the SGX games (I think), and I can barely even remember what they even were. Makaimura seemed to best to me, but if I actually felt like playing that one I'd just buy the Genesis one for $10.

Rofl, I wonder HOW you've played them. Eyes open? Aldynes is a top grade PCE exclusive shooter, a little hard but very fun to play. 1941 and Daimakaimura are good ports from the widely known arcade games. If you've really played Daimakaimura for both the MD and the SGFX you'd agree that the SGFX version is by far superior.
www.pcedaisakusen.net
People said his brain was infected by devils!
PCE Shmupscountown: 109/110 (1to go)
PCエンジン - シューティングゲーム読み秒:109/110個 (1個余る)

termis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1485
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #16 on: August 04, 2007, 06:42:29 AM »
Whatever you buy, I don't think anyone would really disagree that the ability to play CD-ROM games is crucial for a proper PCE experience.

So, it should be either
1) SuperGrafx PLUS Super CD-ROM2 system
2) One of the Duo models.

The question should be really whether you're willing to pay a little extra for the ability to play those extra SuperGrafx HuCards.  I have both setups, but I keep the SuperGrafx stored away just because setup 1) is so damn monstrous.

Black Tiger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11242
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #17 on: August 04, 2007, 02:09:42 PM »
Whatever you buy, I don't think anyone would really disagree that the ability to play CD-ROM games is crucial for a proper PCE experience.

So, it should be either
1) SuperGrafx PLUS Super CD-ROM2 system
2) One of the Duo models.

The question should be really whether you're willing to pay a little extra for the ability to play those extra SuperGrafx HuCards.  I have both setups, but I keep the SuperGrafx stored away just because setup 1) is so damn monstrous.

Trying to run a console setup the size of a Masters of the Universe playset should also be taken into consideration.



they can play Supergrafx HuCards, of which there are only a half dozen, and none are impressive, IMO.

C'mon, three of them are among the best games for the PCE and really worth to buy the SGFX system!

Um...what? I've played all the SGX games (I think), and I can barely even remember what they even were. Makaimura seemed to best to me, but if I actually felt like playing that one I'd just buy the Genesis one for $10.

Rofl, I wonder HOW you've played them. Eyes open? Aldynes is a top grade PCE exclusive shooter, a little hard but very fun to play. 1941 and Daimakaimura are good ports from the widely known arcade games. If you've really played Daimakaimura for both the MD and the SGFX you'd agree that the SGFX version is by far superior.

I can see how some people might find the SuperGrafx Daimakaimura to be better over all than the MegaDrive version, but I think its far from 'far superior'. Both ports aren't so hot.

Aldynes is supposed to be good and I like 1941, but not only do these games go for up to $100 or more, you still have to tack on the price of the SuperGrafx hardware. Where as there are dozens(hundreds?) of great PCE games as good as or better than the SuperGrafx titles that can be had for as little as $1 - $5 each.

Not everyone is a fan of Granzort and I've never heard anyone say they like Battle Ace. So the SuperGrafx is really only good for playing 3 games that the PCE can't.

If Virtua Fighter and Virtua Racing on 32X went for $100 today and Doom for $50, I don't think that many people would insist or even recommend that new Genesis players rush out to buy 32X.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2007, 02:18:52 PM by Black Tiger »
http://www.superpcenginegrafx.net/forum

Active and drama free PC Engine forum

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #18 on: August 04, 2007, 03:13:53 PM »
I can see how some people might find the SuperGrafx Daimakaimura to be better over all than the MegaDrive version, but I think its far from 'far superior'. Both ports aren't so hot.

the SGFX one may be not arcade-perfect, how it should, compared to the enormous strong CPS hardware at that time. but compared to the MD version it is superior and was long time the best port for everyones home (except the x86). and hot it is still today, for sure.
the only slight merit of the MD port is the slightly better sound here and there.
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^

Black Tiger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11242
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #19 on: August 05, 2007, 08:03:30 AM »
I can see how some people might find the SuperGrafx Daimakaimura to be better over all than the MegaDrive version, but I think its far from 'far superior'. Both ports aren't so hot.


the SGFX one may be not arcade-perfect, how it should, compared to the enormous strong CPS hardware at that time. but compared to the MD version it is superior and was long time the best port for everyones home (except the x86). and hot it is still today, for sure.
the only slight merit of the MD port is the slightly better sound here and there.


It may hold up okay to the MD port, , unless you think that it tops even the SuperGrafx-sounding arcade version. However, the graphics don't look so good/polished compared to Forgotten Worlds, Chiki Chiki Boys, 'Dynasty Warriors', 'Capcom World', 1941 CA, and SFIICE on PC Engine. Or even other non-CPS arcade ports like Darius II or Side Arms.

The actual graphics (not counting scrolling, flicker, etc) look more like Strider ACD, only not as nice. Arguably, its the second worst CPS port on PC Engine. Its still a fun game with decent graphics overall, its just not such a great port or overly impressive looking by PC Engine standards.

Certainy not enough to justify spending $200 that could buy 20 better PCE games.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2007, 11:55:34 AM by Black Tiger »
http://www.superpcenginegrafx.net/forum

Active and drama free PC Engine forum

Turbo D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3989
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #20 on: August 05, 2007, 11:56:07 AM »
I bought the supergrafx only after owning the turbo for many years. I think that 1941 and daimaikamura alone justify what I paid for it. I actually got it from some dude on this forum, haha. that bastard never left me feedback  :x

SignOfZeta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8497
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #21 on: August 05, 2007, 12:42:38 PM »
Well the money saved by not buying a SGX and its three supposedly great games will buy you Spriggen 1+2, Kaze Kiri, Star Parodia, Lords of Thunder, Bomberman '94, Gate of Thunder, and a bootleg of Sapphire, all of which a far better than any SGX game. I think that a lot of people would agree with me when I say that none of the SGX games even crack the top 20 of PCE soft.

I think that if you have infinite cash (and space) the SGX+CD is great, but for the more practically minded it isn't even worth the space it wastes. This goes double for people just starting out like this guy is. Like I said, I fully intend to buy a SGX someday because I like NEC stuff, but I fully realize that there is no point in it. The most useful feature of a SGX is its ability to play non-SGX HuCards.

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #22 on: August 05, 2007, 01:09:04 PM »
The most useful feature of a SGX is its ability to play non-SGX HuCards.

more precise, it is the useful feature of its ability to play SGX as well as non-SGX HuCards.
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^

elnino

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 248
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #23 on: August 05, 2007, 09:57:35 PM »
I think that if you have infinite cash (and space) the SGX+CD is great, but for the more practically minded it isn't even worth the space it wastes. This goes double for people just starting out like this guy is.


I've never meant to recommend buying a SGFX to someone who just got started with PCE stuff. But even if you think the SGFX sucks atm, you will sooner or later come to a point where you got most of the finest (Super) HuCard / (Super) CD-Rom(2) stuff. By then (the latest) you will consider buying a SGFX to play three very good games. If you like these games you will certainly get this design award winning console much sooner!

I fully intend to buy a SGX someday because I like NEC stuff


That's teh spirit
www.pcedaisakusen.net
People said his brain was infected by devils!
PCE Shmupscountown: 109/110 (1to go)
PCエンジン - シューティングゲーム読み秒:109/110個 (1個余る)

spenoza

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2751
Re: which is more reliable?
« Reply #24 on: August 06, 2007, 02:05:18 PM »
ibblue, sorry, wasn't ignoring you. I just read back. The site I could get a cheap PCE rig from is now out of stock, and I imagine will not be back in stock... And I constantly lose it in my bookmarks list, anyway.
<a href="http://www.pcedaisakusen.net/2/34/103/show-collection.htm" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">My meager PC Engine Collection so far.</a><br><a href="https://www.pcenginefx.com/forums/" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">PC Engine Software Bible</a><br><a href="http://www.racketboy.com/forum/" c