Author Topic: CoreGrafx vs CoreGrafx 2  (Read 260 times)

lbblue

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 44
CoreGrafx vs CoreGrafx 2
« on: August 05, 2007, 03:55:44 AM »
CoreGrafx vs CoreGrafx 2
Is there any reason to prefer one over the other, besides aesthetics ?

termis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1485
Re: CoreGrafx vs CoreGrafx 2
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2007, 04:06:41 AM »
They are identical other than the wording.

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: CoreGrafx vs CoreGrafx 2
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2007, 04:09:36 AM »
the 2nd one is slightly more collectible.
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^

SignOfZeta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8497
Re: CoreGrafx vs CoreGrafx 2
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2007, 04:42:29 AM »
At the time of introduction, I'm pretty sure the main draw was that the CG2 cost less. Kind of like a PS versus a PSOne. There is no difference other than color. Neither CoreGrafx is as nice looking as the original PC Engine, but they actually have AV out.

lbblue

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: CoreGrafx vs CoreGrafx 2
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2007, 06:57:02 AM »
anyone have an extra one of either they'd trade for the an original pce ?
yeah, didn't think so... :roll:

SignOfZeta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8497
Re: CoreGrafx vs CoreGrafx 2
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2007, 07:23:34 AM »
Yes, actually, I do. Providing your original PCE is still relatively white still. PM me.

WoodyXP

  • Guest
Re: CoreGrafx vs CoreGrafx 2
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2007, 04:23:30 PM »

The CG2 fits into the SuperCDROM contraption a little better.