Rolins is 100% correct. A laptop is worthless without the infrastructure to support it anyway, and I'm pretty sure that most of the kids that get one would rather have shoes and a sandwich. It remains a mystery why anyone in the US would be interested in a 433mhz, 256MB, 7.5" LCD laptop - other than as a way to show everyone what a good person you are.
I think that there are some very very interesting things mentioned in the article...
- Mesh networking = built in internet infrastructure
- Mechanical pull-cord charger = battery charging in the poorest of countries
- Solar panel = charging in poor desert countries
- Efficiently programmed software that doen't require massive technical specs (perish the thought)
It seems like a very good idea. One point raised in the article is that some governments may not be interested in it because it is seen as a "low-end" machine, so political arrogance and chest thumping may be barriers, but to me this laptop seems like a sensible option to start levelling the playing field for many poor countries and communities.
Any communications type tool like this computer can make a difference.
To me, the best use of it seems to be as a way to make computer technology more widespread in places where funds are not available to build the infrastructure necessary to support higher-end machines at this point in time.
I voted "probably" because I think it's a good idea! My concerns about the machine are upgradeability and whether or not it has USB ports.