Are you gonna just sit there and take that? WELL??!!?
haha Joe.
Well, first of all, "2 Super CD"? What is that? Secondly, it's 8 bit CPU is faster and more of a work horse than the SNES' CPU. As for its 16-bit processor, there's actually two of them, which explains why the Turbo makes games hold up and in some cases are better than its Genesis and SNES counterparts.
The two button controller was kinda embarrassing back in the day when you had the 6 button SNES and the 3 button Genesis. However, there really weren't that many games that actually used anymore than two buttons at that time. So, the controller issue really was more of an image thing. "Look, we have more buttons!!!" Though it was annoying the times when you had to use the select button.
CD access time annoying? Yeah, those couple seconds are really annoying....
I hope that reviewer has gotten over his CD apprehension over the years given the fact that even NINTENDO uses CDs now. I'd hate to see his review of Halo: "It's an amazing game, but I just can't wait around for the maps to load so I don't bother playing it."
TTI's titles are more suited for the Japanese market. Well, that's what I loved about the Turbo. I believe EGM, in their 16 bit war review, said that the Turbo Grafx 16 would lead the pack if they could bring over more of their Japanese titles. The Turbo's Japanese flare was an asset, not a hindrance. If only TTI/NEC understood that, the system would have done a lot better in North America. But instead they seemed to take these lame reviewers to heart.
57 games, eh? I'm pretty sure the number of games (CD and Turbochip) was higher than that by '93....no, I'm actually positive. And apparently this reviewer really didn't bother to look beyond the 4-in-one disc.
Bonk and Bomberman are great games and the most familiar, but I think most here can agree that there are many more games that are equally if not more fun.
Anyway, I remember these dark days for the Turbo. It seemed that these magazines were out to destroy it with dumbass reviews like this. I think what I hated most was the whole "it's actually only an 8-bit CPU 'revelation'". Sure, it's true. The Turbo Grafx 16 only had an 8 bit CPU, but it still stood up to the competition. Instead, these reviewers completely dismissed the Turbo based on this without really taking a look at the machine and its games.
I give this review a thumbs down for being lame.