Author Topic: K.I.T.T.  (Read 430 times)

Necromancer

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21366
K.I.T.T.
« on: December 21, 2007, 04:28:09 AM »
Knight Industries Three Thousand

Since NBC is bringing back Knight Rider, Ford decided to piss away a ton of money to promote the GT500 (as if the Ford infomercial that is I Am Legend weren't enough).  They should've stuck with GM and preferably Pontiac, though the only coupe they currently have is the Solstice.  At the very least, they didn't have to slap on such a ricey wing and side scoops that go half way up the door, and why did they have to use a GT500?  Sure, it's got boost, but not from turbos.  If this abomination isn't to your liking, pick up the Hoff's original ride on ebay.

The only thing about the remake that I'm really looking forward to is the delicious Deanna Russo and Will Arnett voicing K.I.T.T.  Of course, no matter how bad it is, it still better than brain dead crap like Deal or No Deal, Survivor, American Idol, or any other scripted reality shows.
U.S. Collection: 97% complete    155/159 titles

Michael Helgeson

  • Guest
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2007, 04:44:30 AM »
Man,when I was a kid this show was the best. I used to play with the toys and everything. Now,its simply embarrassing,esp after seeing the Hoff in a drunkin stuper on the floor eating a miss mash of hamburger in front of his daughter :(

Turbo D

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3989
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2007, 07:05:30 AM »
How can kitt be a mustang?  :x

MissaFX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1031
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2007, 08:29:12 AM »
A mustang?  Lame.  I've always though mustangs were not a whole lot to look at.  I'd almost rather see Kitt a Fiesta, at least then there could be some kind of Herbie commedy relief to the movie when they actually catch up to a bad guy.  They also could have made Kitt a tricked out Yugo or something :clap:



If you remove the spare tire, there's probably room for the onboard computer too! :lol:

Good Traders: nat+, The Old Rover+, bust3dstr8+, nectarsis, geepee+, Mithos, zeon, sensei+, Windancer, OldSchoolGamer
35/62 FX games owned - 56.4%
05/62 FX games reviewed - 8.0%
Latest: Pachio-kun FX review - 4/9/08

bust3dstr8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 612
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2007, 08:49:08 AM »

They should of used the new Challenger, this is the first good looking muscle car in many years.
Mopar went back to the late 60's early 70's for design elements, which I think was a good thing.



Clowns Suck

Necromancer

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21366
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2007, 09:18:19 AM »
Personally, I think that going retro is an altogether bad idea.  Why base the new K.I.T.T. on something styled after a car even older than the old K.I.T.T. ('84 Trans Am)?  A new 'vette could've fit the bill nicely or maybe even a GTO, though they're already out of production.
U.S. Collection: 97% complete    155/159 titles

MissaFX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1031
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2007, 09:22:16 AM »
Personally, I think that going retro is an altogether bad idea.  Why base the new K.I.T.T. on something styled after a car even older than the old K.I.T.T. ('84 Trans Am)?  A new 'vette could've fit the bill nicely or maybe even a GTO, though they're already out of production.

It makes the chopped Yugo perfect then, doesn't it?
Good Traders: nat+, The Old Rover+, bust3dstr8+, nectarsis, geepee+, Mithos, zeon, sensei+, Windancer, OldSchoolGamer
35/62 FX games owned - 56.4%
05/62 FX games reviewed - 8.0%
Latest: Pachio-kun FX review - 4/9/08

Necromancer

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21366
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2007, 09:34:14 AM »
It makes the chopped Yugo perfect then, doesn't it?

No - they were first made in '81 (not that that's the only thing wrong with it).
U.S. Collection: 97% complete    155/159 titles

MissaFX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1031
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2007, 09:45:45 AM »
It makes the chopped Yugo perfect then, doesn't it?

No - they were first made in '81 (not that that's the only thing wrong with it).

Wow they were?  I always thought they were a late '80's thing.
Good Traders: nat+, The Old Rover+, bust3dstr8+, nectarsis, geepee+, Mithos, zeon, sensei+, Windancer, OldSchoolGamer
35/62 FX games owned - 56.4%
05/62 FX games reviewed - 8.0%
Latest: Pachio-kun FX review - 4/9/08

Necromancer

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21366
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2007, 10:11:49 AM »
Wow they were?  I always thought they were a late '80's thing.

They started in '81 in Yugoslavia, came to the US in '85, and are still cranking 'em out in eastern Europe (updated design, of course).  A gal that I used to work with had one.  Surprise, it was junk.
U.S. Collection: 97% complete    155/159 titles

nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7085
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2007, 10:44:12 AM »
When I was 15 going on 16 I had an ongoing joke with all my friends that I was going to buy a Yugo when I got my license and give it a flamejob.

Fortunately, I never did.

Kitsunexus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3911
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2007, 01:22:02 PM »

Tatsujin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: K.I.T.T.
« Reply #12 on: December 21, 2007, 04:34:19 PM »
they shouldn't do this.
www.pcedaisakusen.net
the home of your individual PC Engine collection!!
PCE Games coundown: 690/737 (47 to go or 93.6% clear)
PCE Shmups countdown: 111/111 (all clear!!)
Sega does what Nintendon't, but only NEC does better than both together!^^