Yes, I do understand the difference between a wagon and a sedan. I'm not saying your car is huge, I'm just saying that since it was one of the longest, of not the longest, Toyota sold in the US that year, it isn't "mini". Park that thing next to an 88 MR2 and you'll see what "mini" is. In the grand scheme of cars, its about right in the middle. If you don't see it this way, then you must live somewhere where your perception has been skewed from everyone driving giant-ass vehicles like...Ohio...or Michigan.
Termis: the reason the Honda van is quicker than the two sports cars is mostly the power. Also, the tires. They were using period correct tires on the old cars, which is a huge limitation. There is also the question of theoretical potential. If all three vehicles were allowed $3000 in modifications, I think the two cars would probably get much quicker, whereas the van is probably closer to its maximum in stock form. A 356 with modern day shock technology and race rubber would be fantastic. The power could be doubled and still be usable, where the van...I don't think the chassis could handle much more power than it already has.
I too don't get the whole "fast truck" thing. All trucks are slow. Some trucks are faster than others, but they are all slower than a car with the same engine, but turn/stop much worse and burn more fuel. There is a reason why none of the people in the NBA weigh 350 lbs. I have a 93 Chevy sitting in the back yard that I fire up four or five times a year when I want to go get a Xmas tree or move my tool box. That's all I need it for. The Miata is my daily driver and autocross/track day car. The Jetta is for longer trips, or when the dogs need to come with.
