A confirmation isn't an accusation- and if you're being sarcastic you could've asked Mike about his reasoning.
Obviously I didn't make myself clear, so I'll try again. Like I said in my previous post, I was
only replying to the sentence where Mike confirmed Gunhed's identity (I'd already seen Mike's logic in the shoutbox for believing that Gunhed is Nintega and had no reason to doubt him) and was unconcerned with his response to Nintega. I did not intend to imply that Mike was slicing up troll bait, but rather that had
I asked in my first post "are you that douche f*ck Nintega?", then
I would've been trolling. After knowing that Nintega has once again graced us with his presence (presumably his way of 'destroying' us and likely his best chance), I could care less what is said to him (within reason), as he's had multiple opportunities to be respectable. Besides, I don't think it's possible to troll Nintega anyway, as he'll argue just about anything without provocation.
At least Mike had the balls to hand in his Clue envelope- you just played it safe by talking about deja vu- don't know what you're getting huffy about.
If you don't like my sarcastic reply to Mike's condescending history lesson..... tough shit.