I would proudly tattoo the TG-16 logo, fluorescent colors and all, on my body.Seriously, though, as far as branding was concerned, it certainly stood out and was distinct. It is bold, nothing is subtle about it (even a black & white /graytone rendtion).It's a great logo, but it was not beautiful (like the PC Engine branding). Rather, TG-16's logo was beautiful because it was clunky.I think I like the logo more and more over the years, because of its eccentricities. It lacks "good taste" and "sophistication" and more than makes up for it in the PURE ENERGY it exudes. It is a product of its times, and one of the better examples, IMO.
It's a great logo, but it was not beautiful (like the PC Engine branding). Rather, TG-16's logo was beautiful because it was clunky.
Quote from: esteban on June 30, 2009, 02:32:59 AMIt's a great logo, but it was not beautiful (like the PC Engine branding). Rather, TG-16's logo was beautiful because it was clunky.Like a Volvo - boxy but good.
In my personal opinion, it is the best f*ckin logo ever....period.