Noone claimed he was innocent, he clearly stated his intentions. My analogy with the puppy was poor (as puppies would be considered innocent I guess).
Poor analogy indeed; there's really no other way to interpret 'kicking a puppy' (they must be innocent, for even when they're naughty, they're too young to know any better). Well, I suppose there was one other way to interpret it, based on funny auto-correct errors, but that interpretation wouldn't really fit the context at all.
My intention was to insinuate that some people just enjoy conflict on here. I never shy away from conflict myself, but I tend to do it more defensively then offensively.
Conflict can indeed be fun; a fun you also seem to enjoy, else you wouldn't have jumped into this discussion. Hypocrisy? No, never; them's fightin' words!
Of course I don't expect you to hold your tongue. It's your right to voice your opinion, that's what forums are for right? There is however a difference between having a civil discussion, voicing your opinion and turning things into a pissing match. Examples are in your heartfelt and caring reply that says I'm whining, hypocritical and my statements are foolish.
Oh, yeah, you got me; these discussions are positively dripping with vitriol and those words are truly harsh.
Besides, you
are whining every time you bitch about people being mean around here, and you
are a hypocrite regarding kattare being called out as a price gouger (see below). As for 'your statements being foolish', go back an reread that sentence; I clearly stated that it was foolish to
label kattare as wholly innocent, which was what your poor choice of words seemed to be saying.
As far as me starting the thread? That guy was charging more than 10 times the going rate. Kattare may have been over pricing sure but I wouldn't group him with the guy I started the thread over.
One case may be more extreme than the other, but it's still price gouging (to which kattare agreed); so yes, you are indeed being a hypocrite.