Quote from: Arkhan on November 12, 2010, 07:17:53 PMQuote from: Tatsujin on November 12, 2010, 06:14:48 PMplease do not compare SF with SF2, those are two completely different games from a different era of games this is like saying please don't compare Legendary Axe 1 and Legendary Axe 2.WRONG.
Quote from: Tatsujin on November 12, 2010, 06:14:48 PMplease do not compare SF with SF2, those are two completely different games from a different era of games this is like saying please don't compare Legendary Axe 1 and Legendary Axe 2.
please do not compare SF with SF2, those are two completely different games from a different era of games
The difference is Legendary Axe I&II are both awesome games. Street Fighter is well...hmm
Quote from: Tatsujin on November 13, 2010, 02:16:27 AMQuote from: Arkhan on November 12, 2010, 07:17:53 PMQuote from: Tatsujin on November 12, 2010, 06:14:48 PMplease do not compare SF with SF2, those are two completely different games from a different era of games this is like saying please don't compare Legendary Axe 1 and Legendary Axe 2.WRONG.what the hells wrong about comparing the second game to the first game in a series of games? 4 or so years of time (87-91) is not a huge gap as far as gaming goes. Especially in an arcade. Street Fighter 1 just sucked. They didn't know how to do fighters because thats the game that through sucking hard, defined how a fighter SHOULD BE. SF2 fixed all the problems and thus the good fighting genre was born.
Shinobi due to the missing levels, though it is still great fun to play and the only true-to-arcade conversion that appeared on any of the consoles that I know of.Strider - Yeah, just a bad port all around. Good music, yes.now we have arcade-perfect port included in PS3 Genesis Ultmate collection
You just answered to your own question. Bravo
Quote from: Tatsujin on November 13, 2010, 11:56:51 PMYou just answered to your own question. Bravo no... I just explained why its ok to compare the two games? If you think one game sucking and doing it wrong and the next one being good means you can't compare the two, then I don't know what to tell you.
Now you come up with that "because it sucked" ploy again? I have never said that.
Quote from: Arkhan on November 14, 2010, 06:16:30 AMQuote from: Tatsujin on November 13, 2010, 11:56:51 PMYou just answered to your own question. Bravo no... I just explained why its ok to compare the two games? If you think one game sucking and doing it wrong and the next one being good means you can't compare the two, then I don't know what to tell you.Lol, you can compare what ever and everything you like. Thats not the point. The point is, they are so completely different in almost every aspect. Not just good/bad. And that mostly due to the era difference. And between end 80s and early 90s, 4 years was a huge gap imo.
Quote from: Tatsujin on November 14, 2010, 04:19:24 PMNow you come up with that "because it sucked" ploy again? I have never said that.I said it sucks.You also agreed with me when I said it sucks by quoting what I said and going you just answered your own question!
your point was 4 years of time is too far of a gap to compare the first and second game in a series.