Missed early warnings: 1) victim card played in the subject line.2) swear word used in the subject line.3) thread posted in wrong forum.
SHUTTLECOCK OR SHUFFLE OFF!
The only thing I've read and understand to be an issue when using CDRs is the width of the data track when using 80 minute CDRs versus 74 minute CDRs (which are becoming much less common) On the larger capacity CDs, the data track is thinner to fit more data in the same physical area of the disc. This tigher data track is harder for older lasers to focus on and read. As far as damaging... the only thing I can give credit to is the fact that a laser may have to reseek more, and refocus more to read a CDR. In the long run this could mean more wear on all components involved.
That's good to read. I just bought a stack of 74 min CD-R's at a flea market. Each individually packaged in jewel cases with white trays, which I can use as replacement cases for any jacked up Japanese CD games that I buy. I thought the CDs themselves might not be very useful (I really bought them for the cases), but I'll go ahead and use them any time I want to burn a Duo game.Chris
this thread needs more 'deal with it'
Can't we simply agree the U.S. model Duo was trash from the start and move on? A long history of trouble related to them as this topic shows without any doubt.
The idea that CD-Rs kill lasers is basically bullshit.
its true that bad disks are harder to focus, but i have never seen the focus system fail.the laser failures I have seen are from laser fade, or failure (as in the light source fails), which would not be hastened by poor cd quality.
Local businesses should start using this slogan for promotions. This weekend only!!! It's the once a year, ASS HOLE f*ckED ME OVER SALE!!!!